Ethical Theories
|
Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Somaliland
Professional Orientation Guide
Corporate & Business Law · Taxation
|
Quick Reference - Tax Rates & Key Dates
13. QUICK REFERENCE - TAX RATES & KEY DATES
Domestic Tax Rate Summary
| Tax | Base | Tax % | Admin % | Stamp % | Effective % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll (PAYE) | Gross employment income | 5% | - | 1% | 6% |
| Rental Income (Individual) | Gross rental income | 10% | 2% | 2.5% of (tax+admin) | ~12.3% |
| Business Income | Chargeable income | 10% | 2% | 2.5% of (tax+admin) | ~12.3% |
| GST | Taxable consideration | 5% | - | - | 5% |
| Withholding (non-resident) | Gross international payment | 10% | 2% | 2.5% | ~12.3% |
| Excise (tobacco) | Value of tobacco products | 50% | - | - | 50% |
Key Filing Dates Summary
| Tax / Obligation | Due Date |
|---|---|
| Business Income Tax return (Dec year-end) | 30 April |
| Individual Rental Income Tax | 30 April |
| Payroll Tax (PAYE) - monthly remittance | 15th of following month |
| GST return and payment | 21st of following month |
| Provisional Tax - Corporate (instalment 1) | 30 June |
| Provisional Tax - Corporate (instalment 2) | 31 December |
| Provisional Tax - Individual (quarterly) | 31 Mar / 30 Jun / 30 Sep / 31 Dec |
| Objection to assessment | Within 30 days of notice |
| Penalty interest on overdue tax | 2% per month from due date |
| Record retention minimum period | 5 years from end of year of income |
Capital Allowance - Initial & Annual Rate Summary
| Category | Initial Allowance | Annual Rate & Method |
|---|---|---|
| Eligible plant & machinery - Hargeisa | 50% of cost (yr 1 only) | Reducing balance on remaining WDV |
| Eligible plant & machinery - Outside Hargeisa | 75% of cost (yr 1 only) | Reducing balance on remaining WDV |
| Computers & data handling (Class 1) | 50%/75% if eligible | 40% reducing balance |
| Vehicles, construction (Class 2) | None (transport vehicles excluded) | 35% reducing balance |
| Buses ≥30 seats; heavy goods; farm/mining plant (Class 3) | 50%/75% if eligible plant | 30% reducing balance |
| Office furniture; aircraft; vessels; other (Class 4) | 50%/75% if eligible | 20% reducing balance |
| Industrial Buildings - Annual | N/A | 5% straight-line |
| Industrial Buildings - Initial | 20% of qualifying cost | Applied in year building first in use |
| Small equipment (< $5,000) | 100% immediate deduction | No capital allowance applies |
| REMINDER | Transport vehicles (goods vehicles, buses, passenger cars) DO NOT qualify for the initial allowance - only for annual allowances. |
|
Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Somaliland
Professional Orientation Guide
Corporate & Business Law · Taxation
|
Quick Reference - Tax Rates & Key Dates
13. QUICK REFERENCE - TAX RATES & KEY DATES
Domestic Tax Rate Summary
| Tax | Base | Tax % | Admin % | Stamp % | Effective % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll (PAYE) | Gross employment income | 5% | - | 1% | 6% |
| Rental Income (Individual) | Gross rental income | 10% | 2% | 2.5% of (tax+admin) | ~12.3% |
| Business Income | Chargeable income | 10% | 2% | 2.5% of (tax+admin) | ~12.3% |
| GST | Taxable consideration | 5% | - | - | 5% |
| Withholding (non-resident) | Gross international payment | 10% | 2% | 2.5% | ~12.3% |
| Excise (tobacco) | Value of tobacco products | 50% | - | - | 50% |
Key Filing Dates Summary
| Tax / Obligation | Due Date |
|---|---|
| Business Income Tax return (Dec year-end) | 30 April |
| Individual Rental Income Tax | 30 April |
| Payroll Tax (PAYE) - monthly remittance | 15th of following month |
| GST return and payment | 21st of following month |
| Provisional Tax - Corporate (instalment 1) | 30 June |
| Provisional Tax - Corporate (instalment 2) | 31 December |
| Provisional Tax - Individual (quarterly) | 31 Mar / 30 Jun / 30 Sep / 31 Dec |
| Objection to assessment | Within 30 days of notice |
| Penalty interest on overdue tax | 2% per month from due date |
| Record retention minimum period | 5 years from end of year of income |
Capital Allowance - Initial & Annual Rate Summary
| Category | Initial Allowance | Annual Rate & Method |
|---|---|---|
| Eligible plant & machinery - Hargeisa | 50% of cost (yr 1 only) | Reducing balance on remaining WDV |
| Eligible plant & machinery - Outside Hargeisa | 75% of cost (yr 1 only) | Reducing balance on remaining WDV |
| Computers & data handling (Class 1) | 50%/75% if eligible | 40% reducing balance |
| Vehicles, construction (Class 2) | None (transport vehicles excluded) | 35% reducing balance |
| Buses ≥30 seats; heavy goods; farm/mining plant (Class 3) | 50%/75% if eligible plant | 30% reducing balance |
| Office furniture; aircraft; vessels; other (Class 4) | 50%/75% if eligible | 20% reducing balance |
| Industrial Buildings - Annual | N/A | 5% straight-line |
| Industrial Buildings - Initial | 20% of qualifying cost | Applied in year building first in use |
| Small equipment (< $5,000) | 100% immediate deduction | No capital allowance applies |
| REMINDER | Transport vehicles (goods vehicles, buses, passenger cars) DO NOT qualify for the initial allowance - only for annual allowances. |
Ethical Theories
Before studying the fundamental principles of professional ethics, it is useful to understand the main ways people think about right and wrong. Ethical theories help professional accountants analyse difficult situations and explain the reasoning behind ethical decisions.
Why study ethical theories?
Professional accountants often face situations where the correct action is not immediately obvious. A decision may affect the employer, clients, employees, investors, creditors, regulators, and the wider public. Ethical theories provide different ways of thinking about such decisions.
In this section, we introduce three common ethical perspectives: utilitarianism, deontology, and ethical relativism. These theories are not a replacement for the IFAC/IESBA Code of Ethics, but they help learners understand the reasoning behind professional ethical judgement.
Three ethical theories
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of an action. It suggests that the morally right action is the one that produces the greatest overall benefit or well-being for the greatest number of people.
Deontology
Deontology focuses on duty, rules, and moral obligations. It suggests that some actions are right or wrong in themselves, regardless of the consequences. For example, telling the truth is a duty even when lying may appear useful.
Ethical Relativism
Ethical relativism suggests that ideas of right and wrong may vary between cultures, societies, or individuals. It reminds us that ethical views can differ, but it can also create risk if used to excuse improper conduct.
Comparison of ethical theories
| Ethical theory | Main question | Strength | Risk or limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utilitarianism | Which action produces the greatest overall benefit? | Encourages accountants to consider the wider impact of decisions on stakeholders and the public interest. | It may be misused to justify unethical conduct if someone argues that a bad action is acceptable because it produces a good result. |
| Deontology | What is my duty, regardless of the outcome? | Supports honesty, compliance with professional standards, and refusal to engage in fraud or misleading reporting. | It may be difficult to apply when duties conflict, for example confidentiality versus public interest reporting. |
| Ethical Relativism | How do culture, context, or local practice influence views of right and wrong? | Helps accountants understand that ethical issues may be viewed differently in different environments. | It can be dangerous if used to excuse bribery, fraud, weak governance, or non-compliance with professional standards. |
Examples in accounting practice
How these theories help professional accountants
Ethical theories help accountants ask better questions before making professional decisions. They encourage accountants to look beyond personal convenience, pressure from management, or short-term organisational benefit.
- Utilitarianism reminds accountants to consider the wider consequences of their decisions.
- Deontology reminds accountants that some professional duties must not be compromised.
- Ethical relativism reminds accountants to understand context, while still respecting professional standards.
Ethical Theories
Before studying the fundamental principles of professional ethics, it is useful to understand the main ways people think about right and wrong. Ethical theories help professional accountants analyse difficult situations and explain the reasoning behind ethical decisions.
Why study ethical theories?
Professional accountants often face situations where the correct action is not immediately obvious. A decision may affect the employer, clients, employees, investors, creditors, regulators, and the wider public. Ethical theories provide different ways of thinking about such decisions.
In this section, we introduce three common ethical perspectives: utilitarianism, deontology, and ethical relativism. These theories are not a replacement for the IFAC/IESBA Code of Ethics, but they help learners understand the reasoning behind professional ethical judgement.
Three ethical theories
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of an action. It suggests that the morally right action is the one that produces the greatest overall benefit or well-being for the greatest number of people.
Deontology
Deontology focuses on duty, rules, and moral obligations. It suggests that some actions are right or wrong in themselves, regardless of the consequences. For example, telling the truth is a duty even when lying may appear useful.
Ethical Relativism
Ethical relativism suggests that ideas of right and wrong may vary between cultures, societies, or individuals. It reminds us that ethical views can differ, but it can also create risk if used to excuse improper conduct.
Comparison of ethical theories
| Ethical theory | Main question | Strength | Risk or limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utilitarianism | Which action produces the greatest overall benefit? | Encourages accountants to consider the wider impact of decisions on stakeholders and the public interest. | It may be misused to justify unethical conduct if someone argues that a bad action is acceptable because it produces a good result. |
| Deontology | What is my duty, regardless of the outcome? | Supports honesty, compliance with professional standards, and refusal to engage in fraud or misleading reporting. | It may be difficult to apply when duties conflict, for example confidentiality versus public interest reporting. |
| Ethical Relativism | How do culture, context, or local practice influence views of right and wrong? | Helps accountants understand that ethical issues may be viewed differently in different environments. | It can be dangerous if used to excuse bribery, fraud, weak governance, or non-compliance with professional standards. |
Examples in accounting practice
How these theories help professional accountants
Ethical theories help accountants ask better questions before making professional decisions. They encourage accountants to look beyond personal convenience, pressure from management, or short-term organisational benefit.
- Utilitarianism reminds accountants to consider the wider consequences of their decisions.
- Deontology reminds accountants that some professional duties must not be compromised.
- Ethical relativism reminds accountants to understand context, while still respecting professional standards.